As recently as 70 years ago, weather forecasts were based solely on weather charts.
These forecasts were not particularly precise, as only slightly over half of the predictions came true. But weather models were an absolute breakthrough, and 95–97% of modern weather forecasts for the next 24 hours are accurate. This is made possible by computers or rather to say, supercomputers, and the numerical weather prediction.
In this article you will learn what it is and how does it work from the inside, as if you looked right into one of them — and understood it all.
Weather models are based on one fundamental idea: the atmosphere can be described through physical equations. These equations are solvable, meaning it is possible to find one variable if you know the others. Solving this type of equation is called numerical weather prediction.
It might sound mind-blowing, but all processes regarding air are described with just five equations. They are called “primitive”, although not in the sense of being simple, but rather because they are initial, basic, and primary compared to all of the rest. Primitive equations contain:
There are other important equations, of course. They describe processes only indirectly related to air, which nevertheless influence the main weather elements, such as cloud formation and precipitation, solar radiation, and underlying surfaces.
To avoid confusion and to answer this question more easily, let’s break it down into five separate sub-questions:
Thanks to observation data (that we will elaborate on more in future articles), we know the weather conditions at the present moment. And by knowing the laws that rule the atmosphere, we can find out what these conditions will be like in the future. That’s a weather forecast. But it’s not all that simple.
Let’s imagine the simplest equation: Y = X + 1. If we know the value of X, we can always find Y. This is referred to as solving the equation analytically. However, our equations are much more complex, and cannot be solved in the same way. We can only find their solution approximately, with a degree of uncertainty.
(Of course, all equations are not solved by hand. They are built into the code of models run on very powerful computers, or rather to sya, supercomputers.)
Supercomputers. Carlos Jones / Oak Ridge National Laboratory
First of all, it depends on the presence of observation data. Weather stations are the main source of data that “feeds” the models. There are traditional stations where all measurements are taken manually and automatic stations. The latter is less precise, but takes little space and doesn’t need salaries and days off! Nowadays, long-distance observation solutions, such as weather satellites and radar, are becoming more and more common. There is a lot of data, but it is still not enough. The biggest missing piece is data from above the oceans, where only remote sensing is possible. And the oceans, as you know, play a crucial role in influencing weather worldwide.
Overall, the more precise we want the forecast to be, the more data we need. But there is a problem: to describe all the processes in the atmosphere, we need to take data from every centimeter of the Earth’s surface. And up through the atmosphere!
But even if it were physically possible to install so many weather stations, it wouldn’t help. There is a lot of data, and the formulas are very complex. Even the most powerful computers in the world make these calculations pretty slowly. And the more information we put in, the longer it takes to get a result. Imagine if you wanted to make a forecast for 1 hour ahead, and the calculation of this forecast would take 2 hours. It just doesn’t make any sense!
No, it isn’t. Scientists came up with many “simplifications” that allow compensation for the lack of data and computer-capacity limitations. Well, we call them simplifications, but in reality, they make things even more complex. The number of formulas grows, but they become tailored to our data, our computers, and our goals. A system of equations for synoptic processes is a good example of this type of simplification. It will have cyclones and anticyclones, but convection will be completely neglected. This allows us to speed up the calculations many times.
Parametrizations are developed to ensure that these models don’t lose much quality. They are simplified descriptions of the processes that are not included in the model. Parameterizing physical processes for models is a vast area of scientific research. High-quality parameterizations are one of the keys to the success of any model. The calculation capacities of the computer freed by parametrization can be used to improve any other characteristic of the model.
Weather models are not all the same. We have already written a few articles where we compare the models used in our app in great detail. Here, we are going to put it more simply.
Large international organizations own the most powerful computers. One of the biggest calculation centers in the world is the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF), which brings together over 30 countries from Europe and Asia. Many people consider the model developed by the ECMWF to be the best in the world.
The new ECMWF facility in Bonn, Germany, will be ready in 2026. Visualisation: Render Vision; design: SL/A Architekten / ECMWF
You can use the calculation capacities of a computer in different ways. You can improve the “physical base” of the model, reducing the number of processes that need to be parameterized. You can reduce the distance between spots for which we are making a forecast (that is, increase the spatial resolution) or reduce the time steps. For instance, a global model called ICON has a spatial resolution of 13 km, and that’s not bad at all. However, its version for Central Europe has a resolution of 2.2 km, which is 6 times better. All that is because the calculation is performed for a much smaller territory, and the freed-up calculation capacities of the computer were switched to increasing spatial resolution.
Developing cloud-based technologies also allows for recalculating data from the existing models in better resolution. For example, for our app, we recalculate the forecast with a resolution of 8 km for Europe, and 3 km for East Asia, based on the WRF model on our computers.
The accuracy of numerical predictions is steadily increasing. More powerful computers appear, the observation network grows, and parameterizations are improving. But we can’t trust weather models blindly. Small errors (at the model scale) can dramatically affect your day. For example, a rain cloud can end up right over you when it was supposed to pass by, or a predicted heavy rain can start a couple of hours earlier. To get the most complete and precise weather forecast, we recommend comparing forecasts from different models available in your region and complementing them with weather maps and data from weather radar.
But despite all these limitations, the present and the future of weather prediction will be driven by numerical methods.
In the Windy.app, you can find all the major global and regional weather models. Among the former are ECMWF, GFS, and ICON13, among the latter, of which there are many more, ICON7 for Europe, NAM and HRRR for North America, and WRF8 for East Asia (South Korea and Japan, and other countries). The latter, in particular, is developed by the Windy.app experts themselves, based on the WRF weather model.
To find and select models, simply click on the corresponding icon on the right side of the Weather Map or under the wind rose on the Spot Screen.
Weather models on the Weather Map in the Windy.app for iOS
Weather models on the Spot screen in the Windy.app for iOS
Text: Windy.app
Cover photo: Mikhail Fesenko / Unsplash
What are weather models and how do they work
How to get the most accurate weather forecast. Is it really possible?